Tuesday, October 14, 2014
Sunday, October 12, 2014
Friday, September 19, 2014
Entryism Works
http://i.imgur.com/3gH8hs2.jpg
The above is a post from 4chan, a site mostly populated by teenagers and twenty-somethings. The political discussions there are open to all comers, but usually won by rightist types. What would be paradoxical in a healthy society may be witnessed first-hand: the sanest political websites are those with least oversight, like 4chan.
The Leftists are purging people over on 4chan, formerly a free fire zone for participants, with no PC enforcement. This is their MO: they infiltrate, close the door behind them, then purge their enemies. They've played this entryist game (a page out of communist political strategy) throughout education, the media, Hollywood, non-profits, the civil service, the military. Now they're hitting smaller targets like 4chan, the NFL, Ferguson and assorted random symbolic targets like "racist" NBA owners and "homophobic" business execs. And the whole game is entirely one-sided, its success foregone, because even when an attack fails according to normal standards, the media still counts it as a Leftist win. For example, the Duke lacrosse players accused of raping a black whore were exonerated legally, yet are still considered racist rapists in the media. Same with Zimmerman. But, usually their targets simply capitulate.
The above is a post from 4chan, a site mostly populated by teenagers and twenty-somethings. The political discussions there are open to all comers, but usually won by rightist types. What would be paradoxical in a healthy society may be witnessed first-hand: the sanest political websites are those with least oversight, like 4chan.
The Leftists are purging people over on 4chan, formerly a free fire zone for participants, with no PC enforcement. This is their MO: they infiltrate, close the door behind them, then purge their enemies. They've played this entryist game (a page out of communist political strategy) throughout education, the media, Hollywood, non-profits, the civil service, the military. Now they're hitting smaller targets like 4chan, the NFL, Ferguson and assorted random symbolic targets like "racist" NBA owners and "homophobic" business execs. And the whole game is entirely one-sided, its success foregone, because even when an attack fails according to normal standards, the media still counts it as a Leftist win. For example, the Duke lacrosse players accused of raping a black whore were exonerated legally, yet are still considered racist rapists in the media. Same with Zimmerman. But, usually their targets simply capitulate.
Monday, September 8, 2014
Alternatives to Submission
Larry Auster was, I think, one of the most intelligent of the paleo-conservative Christian-slanted political writers. Here are 2 brief articles on Islam:
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/004636.html
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/003853.html
His whole archive of articles and essays repays attention.
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/004636.html
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/003853.html
His whole archive of articles and essays repays attention.
Most of his Islam articles:
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/011473.html
His central analysis/advice on how the West ought to deal with Islam:
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/006250.html
Auster also recommends this book on the subject:
http://musulmanbook.blogspot.com/
On the main page is a useful summary of the book.
Monday, September 1, 2014
Once More to Rotherham
http://henrydampier.wordpress.com/2014/08/31/englands-easy-meat/
To my sense, nothing is more symbolic of post-Cold War Europe than this scandal. And the only intelligent analysis of it to be discovered comes from the reactionaries and neo-reactionaries, and the occasional paleo-conservative--the MSM and the one-party state rest almost silent.
This is Europe: a land ruled by insane and stupid people who collaborate with barbarians they have invited into their land to ruin the indigenous peoples--barbarians who take the incredible step of systematically raping the indigenous children. The only reason Europe still exists at all is because those barbarians still outside the gates are utterly incapable of imagining how weak it has become. Yet, surely, it is ripe for submission to Allah. Its will and its self-belief are fled.
To my sense, nothing is more symbolic of post-Cold War Europe than this scandal. And the only intelligent analysis of it to be discovered comes from the reactionaries and neo-reactionaries, and the occasional paleo-conservative--the MSM and the one-party state rest almost silent.
This is Europe: a land ruled by insane and stupid people who collaborate with barbarians they have invited into their land to ruin the indigenous peoples--barbarians who take the incredible step of systematically raping the indigenous children. The only reason Europe still exists at all is because those barbarians still outside the gates are utterly incapable of imagining how weak it has become. Yet, surely, it is ripe for submission to Allah. Its will and its self-belief are fled.
Anarcho-Tyranny Unleashed
This is an especially disgusting type of crime. Its enablers (police, media, politicians, ngo's) will suffer not the slightest punishment. The few perpetrators so far convicted received light sentences.
On the theory and practice of anarcho-tyranny: http://www.vdare.com/articles/anarcho-tyranny-where-multiculturalism-leads
Overview articles on Rotherham:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11066244/Rotherham-is-not-an-isolated-incident.html
http://mangans.blogspot.hk/2014/08/rotherham.html
Top feminist websites' (non)-coverage of Rotherham: http://www.kidstrangelove.com/2014/08/29/the-rotherham-child-sex-abuse-scandal-and-the-american-media-coverage-in-pictures/
Some thoughts on the Rotherham atrocities from Nick Land and commenters (the "Cathedral" is the Leftist media-academic complex, those who lead the Leftist religion):
Nick Land:
The BBC fog-machine at work on the UK child-predation story:
Child sexual exploitation is happening in a “number of towns” in different parts of the country, according to the author of a damning report into abuse in Rotherham. … According to an estimate from the Children’s Commissioner for England three years ago, 2,409 children were identified as victims of exploitation by gangs over a 14-month period from 2010-11 …
I’m going to assume that all the fanatically unspecified “men” (or “males”) involved are Muslims of Pakistani origin (abusing white children), unless presented with definite evidence to the contrary. Any other default would be an act of cognitive collaboration with Britain’s sordid little branch-operation of the Cathedral, and we’ve now seen with stark clarity what that enables.
Does the progressive media really think it can de-realize this festival of cultural ruin with a standard inattention protocol? If so, it has to count as an extraordinary peak hubris moment. Perhaps the left is structurally incapable of preventing itself from pushing things over the brink of catastrophe. It always has to take that one additional step, and it has no sense at all of how to back down.
There have to be a lot of people in the UK right now who would be delighted to see the media establishment strung up from lamp-posts, with panic and defection rife in journalistic ranks. It’s surely not impossible that the pattern now jutting into hideous visibility in Britain will evoke a disturbing sense of recognition elsewhere, possibly throughout the Anglosphere. As far as core Cathedral operating procedures are concerned, this has to be a period of (possibly unprecedented) vulnerability. As a source of regime threatening irritability, the Rotherham syndrome is the droit du seigneur of the new nobility — even among a pitifully broken people, it pushes some deeply atavistic buttons. Lies, sexual exploitation, and foreign invasion — who’d want to be PR manager for this cocktail of native degradation?
Commenters:
Scientism: I think perhaps we, from what I assume are our fairly “privileged” positions (not having been “vulnerable youth”, but I only speak for myself here), don’t quite grasp how insidious the Cathedral is. This looks to us like the Cathedral coming apart, but consider that what we have here is a system that managed to train a succession of civil servants to overlook abuse. Not just one or two, but seemingly every last person involved with the council, the police force and the charities, was trained to overlook this kind of abuse, for 16 years.
How can such an outcome be anything but the Cathedral firing on all cylinders, doing what it was designed to do? The immediate reality of the Cathedral for most of us is, essentially, having been misled by the media, having woken up and realised we’ve been lied to, perhaps knowing we’ve lost much of our culture. In the future, we expect some kind of collapse, we think things will get worse. But that’s in the future. On the other hand, the reality of the Cathedral for the civil servants, activists, etc, who are part of it is: Pakistani men raping little white girls while everybody looks the other way. The reality for the media: not reporting on these events, because it might make white people angry at a minority group. That’s their main concern, in both cases, not the abuse. That’s their daily lived experience: being complicit in atrocities while simultaneously being enraged by trivialities.
This is what these guys do all day and have been doing for years. A little scandal isn’t going to change the way they do things. The only thing that’s going to end this is economic collapse or war.
Kgaard: I do not see economic collapse, and I don’t see war coming to the UK’s shores anytime soon. So the existing system continues as is, I guess. When you look to the top of the power structure, the logic of it all is crystal clear: Big business wants the bodies to offset all the babies not being created by native Brits. Labour, meanwhile, wants the immigrants because immigrants vote Labour. So it’s a pact made in hell — and the same pact has been made in the US and much of continental Europe. There is no stopping it that I can see. Who stops it? Who can withstand the combined force of the ENTIRE power structure coming down on their head — from the political left to the right?
Scientism: It’s essentially a set of pernicious feedback loops. The civil servants, the media and a large portion of the British public are experiencing a severe belief bias effect where all evidence confirms their Leftist outlook. Every atrocity is cause to double down on their anti-racist efforts. These efforts protect and enable the gangs and cause more atrocities. This serves to confirm the horrors of systemic racism in the mind of the anti-racist. When the natives try to organise against the protected immigrants, they’re merely seen as racism incarnate, again confirming the Leftist outlook. It’s difficult to see any end to it. These aren’t rational people; they’re caught in a system that develops and maintains a kind of delusive belief system. With the media and most university educated members of the public complicit, there’s little hope of exposure. The outrage of the uneducated masses merely confirms their racist nature. Nationalist groups inevitably find solace in anti-system symbolism and end up goose-stepping down the street, again conforming the worldview of the anti-racists. Everybody has a role to play and everything confirms Leftism! How do you escape that?
On the theory and practice of anarcho-tyranny: http://www.vdare.com/articles/anarcho-tyranny-where-multiculturalism-leads
Overview articles on Rotherham:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11066244/Rotherham-is-not-an-isolated-incident.html
http://mangans.blogspot.hk/2014/08/rotherham.html
Top feminist websites' (non)-coverage of Rotherham: http://www.kidstrangelove.com/2014/08/29/the-rotherham-child-sex-abuse-scandal-and-the-american-media-coverage-in-pictures/
Some thoughts on the Rotherham atrocities from Nick Land and commenters (the "Cathedral" is the Leftist media-academic complex, those who lead the Leftist religion):
Nick Land:
The BBC fog-machine at work on the UK child-predation story:
Child sexual exploitation is happening in a “number of towns” in different parts of the country, according to the author of a damning report into abuse in Rotherham. … According to an estimate from the Children’s Commissioner for England three years ago, 2,409 children were identified as victims of exploitation by gangs over a 14-month period from 2010-11 …
I’m going to assume that all the fanatically unspecified “men” (or “males”) involved are Muslims of Pakistani origin (abusing white children), unless presented with definite evidence to the contrary. Any other default would be an act of cognitive collaboration with Britain’s sordid little branch-operation of the Cathedral, and we’ve now seen with stark clarity what that enables.
Does the progressive media really think it can de-realize this festival of cultural ruin with a standard inattention protocol? If so, it has to count as an extraordinary peak hubris moment. Perhaps the left is structurally incapable of preventing itself from pushing things over the brink of catastrophe. It always has to take that one additional step, and it has no sense at all of how to back down.
There have to be a lot of people in the UK right now who would be delighted to see the media establishment strung up from lamp-posts, with panic and defection rife in journalistic ranks. It’s surely not impossible that the pattern now jutting into hideous visibility in Britain will evoke a disturbing sense of recognition elsewhere, possibly throughout the Anglosphere. As far as core Cathedral operating procedures are concerned, this has to be a period of (possibly unprecedented) vulnerability. As a source of regime threatening irritability, the Rotherham syndrome is the droit du seigneur of the new nobility — even among a pitifully broken people, it pushes some deeply atavistic buttons. Lies, sexual exploitation, and foreign invasion — who’d want to be PR manager for this cocktail of native degradation?
Commenters:
Scientism: I think perhaps we, from what I assume are our fairly “privileged” positions (not having been “vulnerable youth”, but I only speak for myself here), don’t quite grasp how insidious the Cathedral is. This looks to us like the Cathedral coming apart, but consider that what we have here is a system that managed to train a succession of civil servants to overlook abuse. Not just one or two, but seemingly every last person involved with the council, the police force and the charities, was trained to overlook this kind of abuse, for 16 years.
How can such an outcome be anything but the Cathedral firing on all cylinders, doing what it was designed to do? The immediate reality of the Cathedral for most of us is, essentially, having been misled by the media, having woken up and realised we’ve been lied to, perhaps knowing we’ve lost much of our culture. In the future, we expect some kind of collapse, we think things will get worse. But that’s in the future. On the other hand, the reality of the Cathedral for the civil servants, activists, etc, who are part of it is: Pakistani men raping little white girls while everybody looks the other way. The reality for the media: not reporting on these events, because it might make white people angry at a minority group. That’s their main concern, in both cases, not the abuse. That’s their daily lived experience: being complicit in atrocities while simultaneously being enraged by trivialities.
This is what these guys do all day and have been doing for years. A little scandal isn’t going to change the way they do things. The only thing that’s going to end this is economic collapse or war.
Kgaard: I do not see economic collapse, and I don’t see war coming to the UK’s shores anytime soon. So the existing system continues as is, I guess. When you look to the top of the power structure, the logic of it all is crystal clear: Big business wants the bodies to offset all the babies not being created by native Brits. Labour, meanwhile, wants the immigrants because immigrants vote Labour. So it’s a pact made in hell — and the same pact has been made in the US and much of continental Europe. There is no stopping it that I can see. Who stops it? Who can withstand the combined force of the ENTIRE power structure coming down on their head — from the political left to the right?
Scientism: It’s essentially a set of pernicious feedback loops. The civil servants, the media and a large portion of the British public are experiencing a severe belief bias effect where all evidence confirms their Leftist outlook. Every atrocity is cause to double down on their anti-racist efforts. These efforts protect and enable the gangs and cause more atrocities. This serves to confirm the horrors of systemic racism in the mind of the anti-racist. When the natives try to organise against the protected immigrants, they’re merely seen as racism incarnate, again confirming the Leftist outlook. It’s difficult to see any end to it. These aren’t rational people; they’re caught in a system that develops and maintains a kind of delusive belief system. With the media and most university educated members of the public complicit, there’s little hope of exposure. The outrage of the uneducated masses merely confirms their racist nature. Nationalist groups inevitably find solace in anti-system symbolism and end up goose-stepping down the street, again conforming the worldview of the anti-racists. Everybody has a role to play and everything confirms Leftism! How do you escape that?
Contra the Israel Lobby
I do not understand the need to idealize Israel: we can favor them over their barbaric enemies without idealizing them. The American-Israeli relationship has benefited the Israelis enormously, Americans not at all. There is no such thing as what this fellow terms an "unconditional ally," and Israel is the last country that would subscribe to such a sentimental notion. They are the most Machiavellian of nations--both in the sense of manifesting a rare capacity for intelligent decision-making and in the sense of being rigorously unsentimental. Consider the catastrophization of most of its neighbors of late. Do you really think the Jews had no hand in this bloody madness? Have you ever heard of the neo-cons? It happens to be a Jew-run movement and (extremely) pro-Israel. Chaos virtually surrounds Israel. This might sound disadvantageous; but, militarily, it's sound strategy. A mob cannot defeat a properly motivated military.
Thursday, August 7, 2014
Maths and Peoples
Only read this first link down to the quote I pasted beneath it:
http://www.vdare.com/articles/derbyshire-on-race-and-the-international-math-Olympiad
In the Supplement note I link at the bottom you see that 288 whites were up against 120 east Asians--but this is out of total populations of 1 billion and 1.7 billion, meaning 4 times as many competitors per million whites as Asians. What would the Asian average be if they put up 4 times as many as they did? Their average would decline. And blacks made only 41 out of about 900 million, 1/6 the white ratio, and took abysmal scores. Only 1 black scored in the top 260 (getting 17 out of 42), which is barely in the top half. Israel, with only 6 million Jews to work with, scored 18th place--only 3 smallish countries beat it: Singapore and Hong Kong, which only import smart people--and Hungary, which apparently just kicks ass. The American team has gotten more and more Asian and ever less Jewish and European in the last 20 years. Part of that is likely to be laziness among the latter groups. Asians took 19 out of the top 25 spots in this year's IMO. Yet 10 years ago they only got about 13 of 25. And 21 years ago, 11 of 25. It used to be the East European whites who pulled most of the weight for whites, but they've declined. This kind of super-high-IQ competition shows who are capable of making contributions and who aren't--though people cognizant of some basic history and not blinded by PC propaganda already have some idea.
Also, 9 times as many males as females made it into the IMO, yet the male average easily outpaces the female average, especially at the high end--and if you only look at the top 56 males (the top ninth) versus the 56 females, the score averages would be something like 33 to 10.5--yeah, so, thanks for playing girls. Only 1 female (Dutch) scored in the top 50, with a score of 29 out of a possible 42--the lowest score that still makes the top 50 cutoff. Last year only 1 (Jap) made it into the top 55, again at the minimum cutoff of 30 out of 42. Kind of reminds me of chess. Maybe there should be a female IMO. There definitely should be a black one, since they're much weaker than the females.:
http://www.vdare.com/posts/more-on-the-international-math-olympiad-results-by-race-and-sex
http://www.vdare.com/articles/derbyshire-on-race-and-the-international-math-Olympiad
So far as I can discover there have been only three black African IMO medalists in recent years: Chigozie Henry Aniobe of Nigeria with a bronze in each of the last four years; Puis Aje Onah of Nigeria with a bronze in 2010 and Isaac Jean Eliel Konan of Ivory Coast with a silver that same year. (Konan is rather light-skinned, possibly a mulatto.)
It’s a poor showing for a continent that has had established universities for decades.
In the Supplement note I link at the bottom you see that 288 whites were up against 120 east Asians--but this is out of total populations of 1 billion and 1.7 billion, meaning 4 times as many competitors per million whites as Asians. What would the Asian average be if they put up 4 times as many as they did? Their average would decline. And blacks made only 41 out of about 900 million, 1/6 the white ratio, and took abysmal scores. Only 1 black scored in the top 260 (getting 17 out of 42), which is barely in the top half. Israel, with only 6 million Jews to work with, scored 18th place--only 3 smallish countries beat it: Singapore and Hong Kong, which only import smart people--and Hungary, which apparently just kicks ass. The American team has gotten more and more Asian and ever less Jewish and European in the last 20 years. Part of that is likely to be laziness among the latter groups. Asians took 19 out of the top 25 spots in this year's IMO. Yet 10 years ago they only got about 13 of 25. And 21 years ago, 11 of 25. It used to be the East European whites who pulled most of the weight for whites, but they've declined. This kind of super-high-IQ competition shows who are capable of making contributions and who aren't--though people cognizant of some basic history and not blinded by PC propaganda already have some idea.
Also, 9 times as many males as females made it into the IMO, yet the male average easily outpaces the female average, especially at the high end--and if you only look at the top 56 males (the top ninth) versus the 56 females, the score averages would be something like 33 to 10.5--yeah, so, thanks for playing girls. Only 1 female (Dutch) scored in the top 50, with a score of 29 out of a possible 42--the lowest score that still makes the top 50 cutoff. Last year only 1 (Jap) made it into the top 55, again at the minimum cutoff of 30 out of 42. Kind of reminds me of chess. Maybe there should be a female IMO. There definitely should be a black one, since they're much weaker than the females.:
http://www.vdare.com/posts/more-on-the-international-math-olympiad-results-by-race-and-sex
Wednesday, July 30, 2014
Sunday, July 27, 2014
A Plague of Bushsteins
http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/07/26/the-myopia-of-iq-fetishism/
From Steve Johnson in the comments:
From Steve Johnson in the comments:
All Ashkenazi are approximately as closely related as two whites who are third cousins would be. In other words,
Imagine if the Bush family was 1.7 – 2.6% of the population of the country and agitated the way they do now for policies that help the Bush family and helped each other out the way they do now. Doesn’t look like such a minor inconvenience anymore, does it? Instead of maybe a few dozen legacy admits to a few Ivy league schools now you’ve got 30% of the entering class made up of Bushes. Oh, and Bushes count as white for the quotas so actually over half of the whites actually are Bushes.
The Bush family is likely way above the American average in IQ too.
Now realize that the single most important issue to this family is ensuring the security and wealth of the family and that they see a majority white America as the number one threat to their security and wealth.
At least the Bush family is related to most Americans so their interests wouldn’t be nearly as opposed.
That’s why we’re talking about [this] 1.7 – 2.6% of the population.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)