Over-Domesticated

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-31130750

The Pakistanis are like an invasive plant species from the great wide world, transplanted now to a little greenhouse environment in which natural defenses are deliberately suppressed by the rulers: the invader naturally overruns and destroys all the natives in its new territory.


Rotherham has about 250,000 people. The minimum estimates of number abused mean that at least 10% of all the young native English Rotherham girls over the last twenty years have been abused by these Paki gangs. And to this day nothing has been done to prevent future predation: no enhanced protections are in place, and no accountability has been imposed upon the abusers or the neglectful government officials/police. Only Rotherham has been investigated at all competently: the Pakis pursue this modus operandi throughout England, meaning the overall scope of abuse is probably at least an order of magnitude greater than here reported. There are only 10,000 Pakis in Rotherham, but 1.3 million in England (130 times as many).


Europe cannot have its cake and eat it: it cannot sustain its current civilizational path and host tens of millions of uncivilized people. It has now three options: it may expel the barbarians, it may revert to a different, more severe form of civilization, or it may succumb to the barbarians and submit to the Ummah.

Anarcho-Tyranny Unleashed

This is an especially disgusting type of crime. Its enablers (police, media, politicians, ngo's) will suffer not the slightest punishment. The few perpetrators so far convicted received light sentences.

On the theory and practice of anarcho-tyranny: http://www.vdare.com/articles/anarcho-tyranny-where-multiculturalism-leads

Overview articles on Rotherham:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11066244/Rotherham-is-not-an-isolated-incident.html
http://mangans.blogspot.hk/2014/08/rotherham.html

Top feminist websites' (non)-coverage of Rotherham: http://www.kidstrangelove.com/2014/08/29/the-rotherham-child-sex-abuse-scandal-and-the-american-media-coverage-in-pictures/

Some thoughts on the Rotherham atrocities from Nick Land and commenters (the "Cathedral" is the Leftist media-academic complex, those who lead the Leftist religion):

Nick Land:

The BBC fog-machine at work on the UK child-predation story:

Child sexual exploitation is happening in a “number of towns” in different parts of the country, according to the author of a damning report into abuse in Rotherham. … According to an estimate from the Children’s Commissioner for England three years ago, 2,409 children were identified as victims of exploitation by gangs over a 14-month period from 2010-11 …
 I’m going to assume that all the fanatically unspecified “men” (or “males”) involved are Muslims of Pakistani origin (abusing white children), unless presented with definite evidence to the contrary. Any other default would be an act of cognitive collaboration with Britain’s sordid little branch-operation of the Cathedral, and we’ve now seen with stark clarity what that enables.

Does the progressive media really think it can de-realize this festival of cultural ruin with a standard inattention protocol? If so, it has to count as an extraordinary peak hubris moment. Perhaps the left is structurally incapable of preventing itself from pushing things over the brink of catastrophe. It always has to take that one additional step, and it has no sense at all of how to back down.

There have to be a lot of people in the UK right now who would be delighted to see the media establishment strung up from lamp-posts, with panic and defection rife in journalistic ranks. It’s surely not impossible that the pattern now jutting into hideous visibility in Britain will evoke a disturbing sense of recognition elsewhere, possibly throughout the Anglosphere. As far as core Cathedral operating procedures are concerned, this has to be a period of (possibly unprecedented) vulnerability. As a source of regime threatening irritability, the Rotherham syndrome is the droit du seigneur of the new nobility — even among a pitifully broken people, it pushes some deeply atavistic buttons. Lies, sexual exploitation, and foreign invasion — who’d want to be PR manager for this cocktail of native degradation?


Commenters:

Scientism: I think perhaps we, from what I assume are our fairly “privileged” positions (not having been “vulnerable youth”, but I only speak for myself here), don’t quite grasp how insidious the Cathedral is. This looks to us like the Cathedral coming apart, but consider that what we have here is a system that managed to train a succession of civil servants to overlook abuse. Not just one or two, but seemingly every last person involved with the council, the police force and the charities, was trained to overlook this kind of abuse, for 16 years.

How can such an outcome be anything but the Cathedral firing on all cylinders, doing what it was designed to do? The immediate reality of the Cathedral for most of us is, essentially, having been misled by the media, having woken up and realised we’ve been lied to, perhaps knowing we’ve lost much of our culture. In the future, we expect some kind of collapse, we think things will get worse. But that’s in the future. On the other hand, the reality of the Cathedral for the civil servants, activists, etc, who are part of it is: Pakistani men raping little white girls while everybody looks the other way. The reality for the media: not reporting on these events, because it might make white people angry at a minority group. That’s their main concern, in both cases, not the abuse. That’s their daily lived experience: being complicit in atrocities while simultaneously being enraged by trivialities.

This is what these guys do all day and have been doing for years. A little scandal isn’t going to change the way they do things. The only thing that’s going to end this is economic collapse or war.


Kgaard: I do not see economic collapse, and I don’t see war coming to the UK’s shores anytime soon. So the existing system continues as is, I guess. When you look to the top of the power structure, the logic of it all is crystal clear: Big business wants the bodies to offset all the babies not being created by native Brits. Labour, meanwhile, wants the immigrants because immigrants vote Labour. So it’s a pact made in hell — and the same pact has been made in the US and much of continental Europe. There is no stopping it that I can see. Who stops it? Who can withstand the combined force of the ENTIRE power structure coming down on their head — from the political left to the right?

Scientism: It’s essentially a set of pernicious feedback loops. The civil servants, the media and a large portion of the British public are experiencing a severe belief bias effect where all evidence confirms their Leftist outlook. Every atrocity is cause to double down on their anti-racist efforts. These efforts protect and enable the gangs and cause more atrocities. This serves to confirm the horrors of systemic racism in the mind of the anti-racist. When the natives try to organise against the protected immigrants, they’re merely seen as racism incarnate, again confirming the Leftist outlook. It’s difficult to see any end to it. These aren’t rational people; they’re caught in a system that develops and maintains a kind of delusive belief system. With the media and most university educated members of the public complicit, there’s little hope of exposure. The outrage of the uneducated masses merely confirms their racist nature. Nationalist groups inevitably find solace in anti-system symbolism and end up goose-stepping down the street, again conforming the worldview of the anti-racists. Everybody has a role to play and everything confirms Leftism! How do you escape that?

America's Great Adversary

Sometimes our most dangerous enemies are wearing our uniforms. In the case of America over the last 100 years, I would modify that to most of the time. Wilson, FDR, LBJ, Nixon, Bush II, Obama, taking them as both men and as symbols of the elites of their times, did more harm than even our most powerful international foes could manage. America has been spoiled by the absence of serious threats since 1783. Such security has been a rare privilege in national histories, perhaps shared with ancient Rome and certain periods of Chinese history--all of which examples succumbed to the same decadence we see around us, ever-increasing self-destruction and self-indulgence. The Americans, Romans and Chinese all indulged in unnecessary wars. And their elites detached themselves ever more complacently from reality, a detachment which in our case takes the form of the religion of cultural Marxism.

Minions of the Tyrant

http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/hunting_innocent_patriots_on_a_pretext
Apparently Breivik, the right-winger who killed several dozen civilians in Norway, "liked" a letter this fellow Hamilton wrote. Consequently, British Counter Terror units came down on Hamilton and commenced smearing him and lying about his activities. His real crime was opposing the replacement of Englishmen in England with Muslims and blacks. I don't often hear about Muslim preachers being prosecuted when some terrorist "likes" their babblings toward a new Caliphate.

Unthinkable Patterns

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-hunt-for-great-white-defendant.html

Most people have only a subconscious awareness of this pattern--and all that their subconscious actually picks up is that white men are evil. Consider that the time factor may be The Cathedral's crucial advantage. These "great white defendants" are typically smeared by the media for months before they are vindicated. Not being especially bright or rational in any of us, the subconscious ineluctably absorbs months of anti-white propaganda. Is this long training in "good thinking" supposed to be effectively counterbalanced by one day of articles that offer quiet, subdued, coldly factual confirmation--not of innocence, of course--but of dubious acquittal? The Cathedral can fail every attempt to generate its ideal defendant--that is mere tactical failure--the powerful subterranean current of its endless propaganda will continue to win the war, will continue to erode away the foundations of Western civilization.

And didn't Sailer provide a convenient collection for us? Do you know of anyone out there today--or even any publication--that does better journalism, within such a range of specialization, than Steve Sailer?

A Fine Summary of the "Gay Marriage" Gambit

I found this in a comment (5-13-08) on this blogpost-- http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2008/05/ol4-dr-johnsons-hypothesis.html
Needless to say, virtually no one in America actually understands the context "Michael S." elucidates:

The "gay marriage" issue can be understood as a consequence of the redefinition of marriage under a regime of income taxation, the welfare state, and private sector tax-incentivized non-cash employee benefits. This originally took place without the slightest consideration of homosexual relationships.

For most of its history marriage was an institution intended to provide stable conditions for the rearing of children and orderly procedures for transfer from parents to children of marital estates at the time of death of one of the spouses, with an appropriate provision for support of the surviving spouse through dower or curtesy. Homosexual relationships being sterile by definition, marriage had nothing to do with them. Even in societies that did not stigmatize homosexuality in the way Judeo-Christianity does, there was never any historical instance of "gay marriage." Harmodius did not marry Aristogeiton; Hadrian did not marry Antinous. Such a thought would have been risible to them, as well as to the rest of the society in which they lived.

Relatively recent legal and economic changes have tacked onto marriage certain aspects of which it never partook in the past. Spousal and family insurance benefits, tax advantages (in some cases) to being considered as a couple rather than as two individuals, etc., now indeed may outweigh in their economic importance the traditional legal consequences of marriage. Dower and curtesy, primogeniture vs. gavelkind, etc., all were more significant in a time when most deaths were intestate. Today most people with enough assets to worry about take care of such concerns via prenuptial agreements, wills, and trusts. Given all this it does not seem surprising that people in homosexual relationships want to climb aboard the insurance and welfare benefits-driven gravy train that marriage has become for heterosexual couples.

Marriage is a touchy issue because it is a nexus of civil society, religion, and the legal imprimatur of government. Most people are happy with the former two remaining as they are, whereas those that are not happy with them want to use the last of them to force a change in the others. Add to the mix the Frankfurt-school objective of demolishing the patriarchal family as a prerequisite to the total rebuilding of society. See, for example, Marcuse's "Eros and Civilization." I suspect it is more due to the influence of the Frankfurt school than we credit that "gay marriage" has become so significant as a focus of cultural warfare.

Thought Control by Enforced Mendacity

One of the reasons PC is considered to be a facet of or even simply synonymous with cultural Marxism:
http://my-ear-trumpet.tumblr.com/post/45260346809/in-my-study-of-communist-societies-i-came-to-the

A Quondam Reaganite, Now a Cassandra

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/opinion/sunday/sundown-in-america.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

 

This assessment is reasonably accurate overall, but a bit too pessimistic medium-term. He implies virtually no jobs will be created in the next ten years because so few were created in the last ten. Given the nature of the recent job losses, their concentration in certain sectors unlikely to be knocked so hard again, I think the CBO estimate of 16 million new jobs in the next ten years is only moderately optimistic. Stockman also overestimates the damage done by money printing, in whatever esoteric form it occurs. It does economic damage. But, not of an apocalyptic nature in such a situation as ours. Inflation results. Financial bubbles consequent upon inflationary policies produce investment climates with significant amounts of uneconomic investment--which hinders economic growth. But all of these missteps are matters of degree.

The structure of our political economy, however, generates a long-term trajectory that is catastrophic: inflationism, welfare statism, militarism, open immigration,  the manifold delusions of political correctness and the arbitrary restraints it imposes upon thought and action,  a trade policy that causes the loss of strategic industries,  a trade policy that causes the loss of strategic industries, crony capitalism (especially for the benefit of Wall Street). All but the last two of these are natural outgrowths of a political philosophy grounded in cultural Marxism--crony capitalism simply represents corruption, whereas our trade policy derives from a combination of this more insidious form of Marxism and simple elite corruption. The scale of this corruption is unexampled, and it may be argued that the Cathedral's determination to debase the currency is inextricably linked to this cronyism, that the two are even symbiotic. The cronies, after all, just do the Cathedral's bidding for the benefit of both.

A few headwinds, here unmentioned, are out of our control. China and the high growth states will drive up resource prices, and we will pay those higher prices. Sustaining reasonable employment levels in face of increasing automation, leaving aside trade policy, makes for a challenge, particularly given the political implications of the disproportionate incapacities and pathologies of American blacks, Indians, and, to a lesser degree, mestizos. And these are the growth demographics, also coddled, excused, and enabled by the PC ideology.

The solutions he proffers, excising most of the democratic political elements that remain in Washington, would scarcely cure our elite of cultural Marxism, the largest problem--the problem which, if not cured within the next generation will make an end of Western civilization. Requiring a balanced budget is foolish, counterproductive, and practically infeasible. Theoretically, though, his reforms would at least reduce corruption. Yet, ignoring cultural Marxism in favor of an anti-corruption crusade is like giving water to comfort and strengthen a man who was just shot in the gut, but ignoring the wound that threatens his life.