The Multi-Cult, Traitors, Islamization, LKY, Mind Control--The Anti-News

Murray seems to be stepping it down these days, Putnam remains, however absurdly, true red:
https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2015/03/20/charles-murray-and-robert-putnam-on-class/


Freeman Dyson, decorated physicist, properly thrashed by Greg Cochran, less decorated physicist:
https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2015/03/26/so-youre-thinking-of-being-a-traitor/
Great quote apropos such traitors: "In many cases, people seem to have done this for the sheer joy of licking Satan’s arse, not for the money."


The Muslim population doubled in the UK over 10 years--they're now almost 10% of the under 25 population:
http://www.xenosystems.net/moors-law/
From a comment by Kgaard:

This is exactly the sort of anti-life mentality that Nietzsche correctly identified as being integral to Christianity. If you won’t make Aristotelian judgments about what is good and what is bad in THIS world and then fight for them, you end up a pathetic pawn of events — always fighting your own DESIRE to judge (which is innate) but never actually doing so out of guilt. You become resentful of those who are willing to judge and fight for what they determine to be correct and true.
This is the PC COEXIST mindset in a nutshell.

Inadequately eulogized by the MSM:
http://www.xenosystems.net/greatness/
Something less hagiographic from an East Asia expert:
https://bloodyshovel.wordpress.com/2015/03/23/harry-lee-rest-in-peace/
Singapore does have 2 large problems:
1. It's never been self-sufficient in defense, though it could be. It has a population equal to Israel's Jewish population and a GDP higher than Israel's.
2. It's an unbelievable population sink (birth rate of .8 children per woman)--meaning it's not a sustainable example for the rest of the world.


A stroll through one of the most influential political works of the twentieth century (and the more eloquent of the 2 early works on propaganda's place in the modern state--the other being Walter Lippman's 1922 book "Public Opinion"):
https://iamlegionnaire.wordpress.com/2015/03/25/select-quotes-from-edward-bernayss-propaganda/
Of course, rule by propaganda is merely the latest mutation of the Iron Law of Oligarchy.

The French and Their Guests

The American conservatives are delighted with the French Prime Minister's recent "defiant" and "forceful" speech on defending French Jews and defeating anti-Semitism. But, what's wonderful or forceful about this evasive address? He's using the term "anti-Semitism" as a euphemism for "Muslim." Euphemizing the problem is the opposite of being forceful. This is more politically correct garbage from another garbage dealer, one who refuses to recognize the threats posted by both Muslims and Jews. His claim that without the Jews there is no France is absurd--France built itself into the most powerful and culturally accomplished nation in the world during its Jewless era. England followed an identical course. For realists, the question is whether the talents the Jews afford their hosts compensates for the socio-political debasement they inflict. In Israel, this dilemma magically resolves itself. (Could it be the Tribe instinctively undermines the Other, but not itself?)

Over-Domesticated

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-31130750

The Pakistanis are like an invasive plant species from the great wide world, transplanted now to a little greenhouse environment in which natural defenses are deliberately suppressed by the rulers: the invader naturally overruns and destroys all the natives in its new territory.


Rotherham has about 250,000 people. The minimum estimates of number abused mean that at least 10% of all the young native English Rotherham girls over the last twenty years have been abused by these Paki gangs. And to this day nothing has been done to prevent future predation: no enhanced protections are in place, and no accountability has been imposed upon the abusers or the neglectful government officials/police. Only Rotherham has been investigated at all competently: the Pakis pursue this modus operandi throughout England, meaning the overall scope of abuse is probably at least an order of magnitude greater than here reported. There are only 10,000 Pakis in Rotherham, but 1.3 million in England (130 times as many).


Europe cannot have its cake and eat it: it cannot sustain its current civilizational path and host tens of millions of uncivilized people. It has now three options: it may expel the barbarians, it may revert to a different, more severe form of civilization, or it may succumb to the barbarians and submit to the Ummah.

Unshacklings

Beware the website, it's a bit unstable and slow, but Spengler's worth reading. He's a former Reagan official, author, music critic, I-Banker, and Jewish "religious nationalist" supporter of Israel.
http://pjmedia.com/spengler/2015/01/08/what-can-france-do-now/?singlepage=true

Of course, all of western Europe face much the same problem as France. But, the integration experiment looks ever more dubious even to conventional conservatives. To those of us who understand something of human biological diversity (HBD), it never even rose to the level of dubiety: it was a bad game at inception. Algerians, Moroccans, Somalis--and all the rest--are fundamentally discordant with Europeans at the biological substrate. Their intelligence levels and their personalities are quite different--and for purposes of what we recognize as productive civilization--markedly inferior. The Islamic factor is the enzyme catalyzing disaster out of this contrast of substrates. The conventionalists, Left and Right, only see this enzyme, Islam, and wonder how it could turn so vicious. They imagine themselves, in a fit of empathy, as converts to Islam, and perceive only the most reasonable aspects of the religion and culture. But, they are not North Africans nor Arabs nor Blacks. The enzyme reacts differently upon their substrate, not positively to be sure (or we might see rather more converts in the intellectual classes), but not disastrously either. Their attempt at empathy fails because they refuse The Knowledge of evolved differences between human groups. They lose themselves in evasive mazes of circular rhetoric and pathological social status competitions with their nihilist peers.


For a bit more of an HBD focus, this young Irish American woman writes well and extensively about the variety of human types:
https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/category/what-is-human-biodiversity/
https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/category/diversity-doesnt-work/

The Curse of Islam

How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.


No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.

Sir Winston Churchill, The River War



A British politician was arrested about a year ago for reading precisely this prophetic and diagnostic passage in the public square. He was charged with incitement of racial/religious hatred. Islam does indeed disintegrate civilizations when it overtakes them. It knows only how to spend cultural capital, not how to perpetuate it--certainly a creative culture is inconceivable within the Koranic interpretation of life. The celebrants of "Islamic Golden Ages" fail to apprehend the causes of such periods: they only occur when Muslims vanquish superior civilizations and ride their cultural momentum for a few generations, until virtually the entire population converts to Islam and their vitality is sapped. This is the main reason Europe is more endangered than America. The conversionary, goal-oriented weight of Muslim numbers poses a much more precipitous threat than America's Mestizos do--since, like the blacks, they lack the capacity for group autonomy and predictably suffer themselves to become mere puppets of the Left.

Epigrams and Aphorisms from the Right

I must, alas, confess that I failed to note the various authors of these strikes (many were Twitter posts)--but I will publish them anyway:

The more one learns about Charlie Hebdo, the more you realize it's a vile magazine totally supportive of a non-white future for France.

Muslim immigration into non-Muslim nations: the worst idea of the 20th century, after communism.

It isn't whether the French will have the freedom to practice satire. It's whether France has the right to stay French.

When zoo animals get loose and harm people, the question should be to find out WHO opened the cage not to get mad at animals...

So much for the magically transformative power of geography. Two of the three Muslim killers in Paris were born in France.

"There are good Muslims." Yeah, great. Now guess what happens when the bad Muslims win battles? The good Muslims fall the fuck in line.

Lie of the Day: "They aren't Muslims, they're terrorists." You may not believe in tribalism, but tribalism believes in you.

Allow me to encapsulate the mentality of white decadents right now: "There are still plots of non-vibrant land I can retreat to!"

Charlie Hebdo won't wake up the white man. Only the white masses stringing up the white elite will wake up the white man.

I'm coming to think that white European civilization (and outposts) can't survive without a return to a vigorous religious belief.

I think it was a smart attack from the jihadist perspective. Sure, people will pound their chests and declare I AM THIS SHITTY FRENCH MAGAZINE, but back in reality the point has been made. Because it is an attack on the media. It exposes the weakness and insecurity of Western elites. I'm sure there will be a crackdown of some kind, some cells will be rolled up, security will be tightened in some respects. But the impression has been made. Your freedom is meaningless against someone who hates you totally. And now you are surrounded by them.
So for now there will be a crackdown, solidarity, speeches. This will last maybe two months. Then, gradually, a growing concern about those who are always going around upsetting these volatile people. Now these can be talked to, cajoled, threatened. Unlike the men with AK-47s. The recent EU Joint Statement enacts exactly this response: restrict citizens' speech, spy on citizens, disarm citizens, propagandize citizens--and, of course, continue current immigration policies. Overall, it looks like a big, big win for the Islamists.  

Once More to Rotherham

http://henrydampier.wordpress.com/2014/08/31/englands-easy-meat/
To my sense, nothing is more symbolic of post-Cold War Europe than this scandal. And the only intelligent analysis of it to be discovered comes from the reactionaries and neo-reactionaries, and the occasional paleo-conservative--the MSM and the one-party state rest almost silent.

This is Europe: a land ruled by insane and stupid people who collaborate with barbarians they have invited into their land to ruin the indigenous peoples--barbarians who take the incredible step of systematically raping the indigenous children. The only reason Europe still exists at all is because those barbarians still outside the gates are utterly incapable of imagining how weak it has become. Yet, surely, it is ripe for submission to Allah. Its will and its self-belief are fled.

Vive la France?

http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2013/10/marine-le-pens-eurosceptic-front.html


'Twould indeed be slightly ironic if the French were to lead the way out of the Brussels trap, this transnational bureaucratic dictatorship, successor disaster to the Soviet Union. It matters not a whit to me who leads, so long as it happens. And the French have been infatuated with the political about-face for 224 years. Also, they've frequently allied themselves with the Russians, who've returned to a semblance of strength and self-respect. Another incentive: to distinguish themselves from their great historical rivals, Britain (where Socialism is again on the march and only Muslims have free speech) and Germany (which is still prostrate with "national guilt" and reveling in masochistic denigrations of itself). And to snub the Americans, as this emphatically would, also forms a priceless triumph for the French, high and low--especially with a walking caricature of political correctness trying to perfect socialist tyranny from the White House. In any case, I'd rather contribute to "le Front National" than to either of the twin tools of cowardice and corruption "competing" America.

The Greek Circle

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/30/business/global/athens-no-longer-sees-most-of-its-bailout-aid.html?_r=1

The primary goal of this financial rigmarole is to blind the European taxpayers (ie the Germans) to the reality of their position. Imagine having a sordid, lying, cheating, stealing Section 8 tenant--then solving her insolvency by paying yourself the rent she owes you. Of course, this is only a temporary expedient until she reforms her ways!

Though most people cannot understand the procedural intricacies of the Eurocrats and their obliging Greek "friends", an editorialist can readily sum the figures for his readers. That sum, by the way, seems to be about $70 billion out the door and in the wind thus far, with real interest rates consuming about $5 billion a year so long as the Germans continue to service 75% of Greek debt. But, in addition to paying interest, they persist in sending more fresh capital into the black hole. Their total default exposure is around $170 billion just for Greece's public debt. Greek banks also owe debt to the Germans in the multibillion dollar range. If Greece leaves the EU, the nominal cost will probably be $300 billion or more. The real cost involved in radically upending business expectations and altering the terms of trade will be substantially higher. And the cost will fall upon the creditors primarily in either case. 

And then we have the Iberians.

The Dangerous Prevalence of Moral Contagion

Krugman on Europe (the article is a good summary and analysis, leading to a typical socialist course of treatment for the patient):

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/magazine/16Europe-t.html?hpw

 

My comment:

Those nations that do not sustain the fiscal standards of the EU's economic leaders ought to be encouraged to leave. It's a well-established psychological reality (for which I wish I had a ready link and clearly recall reading a striking study on) that low standards are more contagious than high standards. Greece et al. set low standards for integrity, for discipline, for self-reliance, for productivity. They will not Germanize if bailed out endlessly by the Germans--but, the Germans may be sufficiently demoralized by such a parasitic dynamic to turn Greek. The cultural/psychological contagion is what must be contained. Krugmanite socialism would only spread the disease (and encouraging this contemptible proto-"Idiocracy", in the long run, does less to alleviate the human suffering he harps upon). At the very least, high standards are difficult and time-consuming to develop, low standards can spread readily and rapidly. It's a perilous asymmetry, especially in an obsessively egalitarian intellectual milieu, like the Western world. As Nietzsche insisted, in practice equality is possible only by pulling down the higher men and the higher societies.

 

The European Spirit and the Jews

The hatred Hitler inflicted upon Europe and which it has ever since redounded upon his dreams, the nanny-state weakness engendered by post-war prosperity, the psychological damage of the most terrible wars known to man, the fear of Jewish superiority and otherness, the complacency toward a Muslim population implicitly presumed to be inferior, the outgrowth of political correctness as a self-lacerating ideology created in response to prior evil ideologies (esp. Nazism), the nature of all ideologies and ideologues to privilege loyalty in thought and speech over truth, the failure to understand that Islam is a far more powerful and implacable ideology than "political correctness" can hope to be--in fact, the most powerful ideology Europe has ever experienced, more powerful even than Christianity ever was----All of these factors play a role in current European developments.

Europeans feared the Jews as aliens from the time of their arrival and applied to them special restrictions and, after the first few generations of occasional mixing, Christians and Jews lived as separate populations. Due to the nature of the specialized roles (esp. trade and finance) which the Jews came to monopolize, shrewdness was a characteristic more useful to Jews than to Gentiles. Also, more than the Christians, the Jews in their long exile valued book learning and rewarded the best scholars. The high value their circumstances and culture placed on shrewdness and on learning probably caused a virtuous circle in which the most successful, in terms of these characteristics, obtained more wealth and produced more children. This is called eugenics, here in the form of breeding for high intelligence. Not only are the Jews vastly overrepresented in their intellectual achievements vis-à-vis the Muslims, they have, in proportion to population, at least a 10-1 advantage over Gentiles in terms of the academic Nobels and the Fields Medals, and the more cognitively challenging the field the greater their relative advantage. Here’s a recent  paper laying out the possibility of eugenic evolutionary pressures for Ashkenazi Jews:
http://harpending.humanevo.utah.edu/Documents/ashkiq.webpub.pdf


It is natural to fear the alien. But, when that alien is superior to you genetically and culturally--tolerance of such circumstances among the general populace is unlikely to last. Europe chose the worst solution to the social tension that arose as Jews rose to the top in the socioeconomic competition—which happened in proportion to their escape from the traditional restrictions on their activities, beginning in the eighteenth century. The best solution, perhaps, among those within the realm of human possibility, was one suggested by Nietzsche in the 1880s: the aristocratic and officer classes of the nations of Europe (and presumably other elite elements of Gentile society) should strategically intermarry with the Jews to engender the “good Europeans” who would lead a united Europe. The risk would have been the demise of Jewry as a race and culture distinct from any other. In any case, the Europeans did not have the courage for this grand vision of the future. They succumbed to petty, mindless nationalism and narrow, often brutal ideological dungeons for generations, then, post-Hitler, turned to a suicidal pacifism as an ineffectual and equally stupid repentance for the past. Nor did they consider calling a halt to their mad fantasy quest to undo the past after renouncing the potentially noble endeavor of colonialism (the end of which produced quite catastrophic results, perhaps as bad, in terms of human suffering, as the world wars which were the proximate cause of the pullback), instead they pressed on, and, entangled in their delusions, they begged, in action and not only in words, for the opportunity to submit to a reverse colonialism. They place a higher priority on attempting to atone for the past and on massaging their consciences than on actually enacting the good in life. And Hitler’s ghost laughs at these weak fools who still cower in his shadow and thereby prepare the way for a worthy successor, another visionary of the  Götterdämmerung or a conquering caliph.

How could this happen? By what perverse logic are these people guided? For centuries Europe's will to power in both the spiritual and material realms has slowly subsided in face of the combined assaults of philosophical skepticism (at least, among the elite) and increasing sensitivity to pain and to fear (characteristic of the people at large, who became, as a united conforming mass, politically significant as democracy spread). Having no intellectual elite outside of the close-minded priestly class, Islam does not suffer the first philosophical weakness, and its economic primitivism and "eye for an eye" moral-religious code keep it relatively safe from oversensitivity. Result: the Muslim will to power sees Europe as ripe for submission. It seems that the human psychological equation dictates that more stupidity and more brutality produce more will to power.

Thus, having destroyed their great chance to be led by the Jews, an authentically superior people, or by a superior mixed race, like Nietzsche’s good Europeans, the bad Europeans come instead to power and proceed to prostrate themselves before an inferior people.

Yet, just as the world wars and the Holocaust revolutionized European psychology into the submissive form we find today, there remains the possibility of another revolution. Perhaps an excess of Muslim brutality will revive Europe, sharpening its intelligence (perhaps from an exodus of Israeli Jews to newly welcoming parts of Europe), strengthening it by exposure to inescapable brutality, and replacing the weak-born and birthing quality of sensitivity with the strength-engendered and engendering quality of generosity.

A Criminal Enterprise

The fact that two thirds of the Catholic bishops in Ireland were involved in the cover-up of paedophilia ought to suffice for the Catholic church in Ireland to be deemed a criminal organization--and outlawed. The Catholic church, already in terminal decline throughout most of Europe, can hardly afford to have its truths revealed. But, even after this process is complete and Christianity in Europe finally rendered extinct (since Protestantism is in similar decline), what will become of the moral life of these peoples remains a mystery for intellectuals and artists to guess at. http://douthat.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/01/the-tragedy-of-irish-catholicism/

Criminal Psychology

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/04/weekinreview/04kimmelman.html?ref=weekinreview The competition in Europe today is to determine which nation is the most passive/submissive. The Muslims think this fits well with their competition to determine who is the most dominant.

On Health Reform

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/14/business/economy/14view.html?ref=health I think this paragraph is key to the problem, and the main reason why reforms of the health system as a whole have yet to happen, despite the huge cost burden the system now inflicts: "Of course, we have not made such Medicare spending cuts yet, and there are few signs that we will. A Kaiser Family Foundation poll found that 67 percent of Americans believe that they do not receive enough treatment and that only 16 percent believe that they have received unnecessary care. If the Obama administration covers more people with government-supplied or government-subsidized insurance, the political support will broaden for generous benefits, their continuation and, indeed, expansion of current expenditures." Essentially, people become dependents and develop a dependency psychology--they come to prefer safety and ease to freedom and power. At the end of the process, you get Europe, that is, stagnancy and weakness. Europe has been ripe for conquering and eager for submission ever since it was socialized in the 30's. Most of the continent transitioned directly from a class-determined social system in which the great majority had neither power nor responsibility directly to socialism in which the same basic conditions prevail--the lack of freedom and responsibility. Only America saved it from itself: we reversed the tide in WWII (which was a socialist tide), we held the line against full socialization during the Cold War, and the ongoing Muslim influx simply represents a new opportunity for Europe to surrender.