Let us compare these two sources to discover flagrant mendacity by omission:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364163/18-men-boys-charged-gang-rape-11-year-old-girl-mobile-home-Cleveland-Texas.html |
Of course, in Africa, this sort of thing is so common that it's not newsworthy. But, in a sense, blacks are always in Africa. The NY Times, being the principal national organ for defining political correctness, cannot bear to report the facts of this horrific case. The doctrine of PC inculcates black victimology and rejects black criminality as an illusion created by an unjust, racist society. Beholden to this item in their catechism, mention of the black facts is verboten--particularly that it was a large group of black, and only black, men and boys who repeatedly raped this 11 year old Mexican girl over the course of 10 weeks, keeping her silent with threats of violence. But, the NY Times does go deeply into the problems of the families of the rapists, and tacitly agrees with them that their rapist family members were engaged in consensual intercourse with a "slutty" girl who deliberately tempted them. Is there an award for worst journalism? Like the Razzies for acting? These reporters ought to be, not only fired, but run out of the profession. I have never paid a dime for the privilege of reading the NY Times. I never will.
No comments:
Post a Comment